On Gravity and using Inertia to overcome it – 06/07/17 written for KeelyNet by Jerry W. Decker – Sandy Kidd “What we have here is a potential space drive,” Laithwaite

06/07/17 – Beyond 2001 – How One Man Revolutionised the Laws of Physics 
I received your email via Jerry Decker, whom I have corresponded with in the past. I was quite interested in the fact that there seems to be an element of belief in my work. I have to say that over the years my machines and laboratory test reports have been treated with contempt. I am 80 years old now but it is amazingly refreshing to find that there are others who at least consider the possibility of inertial drive as it tends to be called.

30 years ago in the University of Dundee where my device was being subjected to their form of analysis I decided to demonstrate the fact that I could control the centrifugal force generated on a rod of fixed length with an attached fixed mass at a fixed rotation speed. I demonstrated to a team of two or three engineering department members which was received without any form of reaction. None are so blind.

I knew I would have problems with my claims from that time onwards. I take it that you are aware that I built a device in Australia in the mid 1980s at the request of an Australian businessman. My device on test at the VIPAC laboratories in Port Melbourne proved without doubt that Inertial Thrust had been achieved in 20 successful runs out of 20.

Unfortunately the engineering team could not make the results comply with Newton so in their opinion it could not be developed. That lab report is available with photo of the device and US Patent application.

That all said, the device shown on YouTube works for a whole set of different reasons, and I have to say that none of them are obvious to the beholder.

I can easily explain Laithwaite’s large flywheel demonstration and that other antigravity flywheel demonstration. Not many people appear to have gone to the trouble of mechanically accelerating gyroscope, or more correctly flywheel systems, as the results are not quite as expected. I do not think Euler was aware of what goes on in such systems. – Best regards, Sandy Kidd

“What we have here is a potential space drive,” Laithwaite said. “Properly developed, this would take you to the outer universe on a spoonful of uranium.”

06/07/17 – Marsden Inertial Lift 
Disturbing video from the inventor “Mike Marsden”. The device called “Mac Quan 1” is able to come to weigh “negative”. The implications of such a machine are very large. I have looked for more information about the inventor and his with without success. If someone has more information, it would be interesting to share it.

06/07/17 – Jump faster than you fall 
KeelyNet This is my favorite real world test which I understand was carried out in a research lab in Japan.

Notice the most remarkable triple jump before it lands on top of the box. Using inertia as the phantom ground to push against.

It is the single best demonstration I’ve ever seen to illustrate the myth of Baron Munchhausen jerking himself and his horse out of quicksand. – JWD

Baron Munchausen – In one of the Baron’s adventures, he rescues himself from a swamp, as a metaphor for belief in complete metaphysical free will; Nietzsche calls this belief an attempt “to pull oneself up into existence by the hair, out of the swamps of nothingness”.[79]

When, at least in my opinion, it is a clear demonstration of how we can use inertia to lessen weight and overcome gravity.

Another remarkable claim for a commericial size inertial drive powered airship was 02/28/14 – The American Gyro ‘Gyradoscope’ Inertial Flyer – The exact mechanism by which this effect is produced is somewhat obscure, but a model of the device already built has been bolted to the floor of a freight elevator, it is claimed, and succeeded in raising and lowering it with ease. In this test a 20-horsepower gasoline engine furnished power. Lifting force exerted by the gyradoscope is likened to that of a ball thrown on the end of a string. The weight of the ball at the moment it draws the string taut exerts a lifting effect on a pencil or other object to which the bottom of the string may be tied. In the gyradoscope the moving weights on the wheels are analogous to the thrown ball.

KeelynetPost a Useful commentSomething from Nothing RevisitedRectifying ChaosWhy we don’t Want Anti-Gravity – just yet!to www.keelynet.comKeelynetYour (Mostly) Dead Predecessors

“Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible.” (Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895)”I think there is a world market for maybe five computers.” (Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943)”There is no reason for any individual to have a computer in their home.” (Ken Olsen, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corp., 1977)”The telephone has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered as a means of communication. The device is inherently of no value to us.” (Western Union internal memo, 1876)”Airplanes are interesting toys but of no military value.” (Marshal Ferdinand Foch, French commander of Allied forces during the closing months of World War I, 1918)”The wireless music box has no imaginable commercial value. Who would pay for a message sent to nobody in particular?” (David Sarnoff’s associates, in response to his urgings for investment in radio in the 1920’s)”Professor Goddard does not know the relation between action and reaction and the need to have something better than a vacuum against which to react. He seems to lack the basic knowledge ladled out daily in high schools.” (New York Times editorial about Robert Goddard’s revolutionary rocket work, 1921)”Who the hell wants to hear actors talk?” (Harry M. Warner, Warner Brothers, 1927)”Everything that can be invented has been invented.” (Charles H. Duell, commissioner, US Office of Patents, 1899)”The [flying] machine will eventually be fast; they will be used in sport, but they are not to be thought of as commercial carriers.” — Octave Chanute, aviation pioneer, 1904.”The ordinary ‘horseless carriage’ is at present a luxury for the wealthy; and although its price will probably fall in the future, it will never come into as common use as the bicycle.” — The Literary Digest, 1889.”[It] is, of course, altogether valueless…. Ours has been the first, and will doubtless be the last, party of whites to visit this profitless locality.” — Lt. Joseph D. Ives, Corps of Topographical Engineers, 1861, on the Grand Canyon.”Landing and moving around on the moon offer so many serious problems for human beings that it may take science another 200 years to lick them.” — Science Digest, August, 1948.”X rays are a hoax.” “Aircraft flight is impossible.” “Radio has no future.” — Physicist and mathematician Lord Kelvin (1824-1907)”I think there is a world market for maybe five computers.” — Thomas Watson, Chairman, IBM, 1943.”The bomb will never go off, and I speak as an expert in explosives.” — Adm. William Leahy, U.S. Atomic Energy Project, 1945.”Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons.” — Popular Mechanics, 1949.”We don’t like their sound, and guitar music is on the way out.” — Decca Recording Co., in rejecting the Beatles, 1962.Keelynet

Vanguard Sciences